Castle of ZZT

55.7 KB
68 / 68
4.50 / 5.00


By: JohnWWells
Reviewed: 15 years, 6 months ago (Dec. 27, 2006)

In a fit of nostalgia, I installed DOSBox and downloaded Castle of ZZT.

For nostalgia, I couldn't have done better. A homage to the Tim Sweeney ZZT games, Castle of ZZT is a plotless formula piece, and proud of it. How closely does it adhere to formula? Well, in the first room, a scroll gives us the intro, which ends like this:

"[...] five doors lock behind you. I think you can see where this is going.

-= Welcome to the Castle of ZZT. -="

Yes, we can see where this is going, and if we don't quit right there, we've no right to complain later. This is OLD-SCHOOL, and good OLD-SCHOOL at that.


The most obvious improvement David Newton's made to the old-school formula is graphical. This isn't a believable castle - how could it be? - but it's pleasant to look at, and the color schemes are coherent and restrained. Newton knows how to lay out a fine-looking board.

The castle's architecture is equally effective. Newton (usually) avoids forcing the player to cross long, empty distances, re-uses space in fairly elegant ways, and maintains a continual sense of exploration. He has to - there's no plot to keep things moving. But there is that locked door you saw earlier, that intriguing chamber that you can't get to right now...

The gameplay is competent, well-paced, and, with the exception of one interesting maze -


  • cheerfully unoriginal. It's not that Newton imitates the STYLE of the Sweeney games - he lifts entire sequences out of them. When pushing bombs around to blow up a field of breakables without opening a path for some star-shooters, I'm tempted to edit the board and clear a path with the spacebar. I mean, I've played this already, in Town of ZZT.

In one way or another, that goes for almost every one of the puzzles. The old-school formula can work if the puzzles somehow surprise us, but here we get, at best, a dubious "gotcha" when we render a slider puzzle unwinnable, or get ambushed by ruffians.

(Not that there's anything wrong with ruffian ambushes. The most fun I had playing involved duplicators, ruffians, and the realization that I was trapped in a mausoleum with fast, angry ghosts.)

Basically, this game throws fewer curveballs than the games it imitates. The slider puzzles are easy, one of the teleporter mazes is so linear as to be a ping-pong path in disguise, and the prefab enemies very rarely overwhelm us. A treasure hunt involves following literal directions precisely, a machine can be fixed by shooting breakable walls, a multiple-choice riddle game can be solved with basic ZZT knowledge, and a musical combo lock can be opened by - well, if you don't have working speakers, you'd better ?+zap.

Little thought is needed here. This isn't Barjesse's Nightmare, or anything like that.

Are there any original puzzles? A few. But generally, the ones that aren't from the Sweeney games can be found in later ones, though the resemblance generally isn't so perfect as to suggest direct imitation. More likely, there's just so much you can do with this formula.

All this said, I wish Newton had directly copied one more thing from earlier games, though. Converting ammo, torches, and health to score at the end would have been a good move, and rating the player's performance based on this would have been even better. It's too easy just to win, given how forgiving the game is.

Note: Most of the above misgivings might well be irrelevant if you didn't spend your childhood playing old ZZT games.


Long CONS section aside, this is a good game. Castle of ZZT is playable, colorful, and fun, and it's laudable that Newton wrote a solid game for such a limited audience. You've got to love ZZT to turn out a game like this when it's bound to get a grand total of two reviews. Newton, to quote a million hack reviewers, "respects the material." 5/5.

On the other hand, if this game had been released three years ago, it would have been regarded as solid, but not brilliant. 4/5.

So I'll put a 4, but if you're new to ZZT, add an extra point. I unhesitatingly recommend Castle of ZZT to new players.

Rating: 4.0 out of 5.0
Other reviews written by JohnWWells

a winning formula

By: Commodore
Reviewed: 15 years, 9 months ago (Oct. 7, 2006)

there is a unresolved argument in the ZZT community about the quality of the original games as made by Tim Sweeny. Similarly there are two types of ZZT games, ones where everthing is what it is supposed to be, and ones where everthing is what the designer wants it to be. This game is a stunning example of the first.

On your mark, get set, go get some purple keys.

This is the third game this author has made in the classic style. Then he went under the name Wong Chung Bang.

Like the previous games, Castle of ZZT captures much of the feel of the originals. There has been a lot of progression over the three games, in all areas. The text is very limited and not distracting. It's appropriately light and humourous when it does appear.

Graphically the game takes a harder line than it'd predecessors. It has more of its own style than the previous games in his series. There more attention paid to patterns: with walls made from fades, to checkerboards. Colour is used appropriately to create unique atmospheres for each seperate.

Now the game itself. The castle is immedietly imposing in it's size when you begin and start to poke around the fringes of the main area. Monster scare you away from certain areas, imposing puzzles in others. Mysterious areas you can see but not reach are everywhere. You'll soon discover that this place, this game, is BIG. You'll think you'll never see a purple key until you're halfway through the game. You'll be almost right.

Shooting things is of course a must. The game makes use of different coloured monsters to represent different behaviour. (Blue ruffians slower, dumber than purple ones.) Monsters are not overused and are placed rather tactically, like tigers who jump you through a breakable wall when their shooting direction changes. Ammo and health was in abundance, but at a good balance.

Puzzles were a mix between old classics (three lakes) to newer and more clever ones. One of the best consisted of blocks that rotated around richochets upon being touched. And another, the opening of the vault. In all the varity of puzzles was refreshing and the way in which they were presented made them even better. I admit I got frustrated to the point of zapping only once. Remember, save often.

As of late there have been three oldbies with returns to the ring, with three good releases. This alone qualifies this year in zzting as perhaps better than the last. Get it while it's hot.

Rating: 5.0 out of 5.0
Other reviews written by Commodore

New Review

Markdown syntax is supported for formatting.

Optionally provide a numeric score from 0.0 to 5.0

Reviewed: July 5, 2022

Rating: out of 5.0 This user has opted out of providing a numeric rating